Showing posts with label sociobiology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sociobiology. Show all posts

06 October 2008

'Junk' DNA conjectures

[recent news item]


  • DNA is the memory molecule
  • some 'silent' DNA is race-memory/collective unconscious [Wiki]
  • this quantity increases slowly via evolution
  • it starts with the highest-priority 'knowledge'
  • it must be profoundly universal
  • the coding system has to allow generalisations
  • generalisations are behavioral 'puns'
  • Joyce's Finnegans Wake was his attempt for a universal inventory of the highest-priority behavioral puns






.

The ontology of the Con

reagan's victory in 1980
was a cold awakening for us hippies
the progressive dream drowned

and ever since we've been pedaling in sand
in tar
no traction

i see one hope

the solidity of science

social science without academic bs

an a.i. simulation of the Con

world history rewritten

in the broader context of psychological evolution

the etymogeny of meaning

the mysterious depths of sexuality

wakefulness intimidation ego and sleep






.

29 October 2006

Sociobiological ethics

my favorite paragraph
of EO Wilson's 'Sociobiology'
is where Robert Trivers demonstrates
that any species which can
recognise individuals
should evolve towards
altruism
(because selfish individuals
will be held accountable)

because it supplies a cornerstone
for any future
leftwing evolutionary ethics

not me-first libertarianism
but honor-first superchivalry

where (eg) lying to get ahead
is unthinkable

but i've yet to see this clue
fleshed out into
the full, necessary
blakean christianity

in which personal experiment/experience
is the driving force
unconstrained by those damned
social 'braces'

acknowledging we've been bogged down
for some millennia
in inauthenticity
that has been overriding our finetuned
billion-year-old
genetic wisdom

encouraging non-conformity
local experimental communities

exploiting the internet
to hand government back
to the people

eliminating corporations'
bogus claim to privacy
so communities can freely
monitor their ethics




one stubborn quandary
that bugs me still
is
dog-eat-dog
vs
the nanny function

whether the state steps in
when individuals behave dishonorably

or instead insists
the victims learn
to defend themselves...?